Categories
Other

Remember that your grade depends on both content (unity, coherence, organization, etc.) as well as grammar.

Your paragraph must contain a minimum of 10 sentences and must be at least 125 words in length. Do include a title. Proofread carefully to avoid both major and minor grammatical mistakes. Remember that your grade depends on both content (unity, coherence, organization, etc.) as well as grammar.

Categories
Other

I also provided links to the experiment so you can see if more info needs to be addd

Writing annotated bibliograpies on three different social psychology experiences. If you could elevate my annotated bibligraphies for all three of them and make them sound better so that it sounds really nice and add in more infornation that you deem necessary or proof to back up your point! I also provided links to the experiment so you can see if more info needs to be addd
I have attached the document below.

Categories
Other

Reasoning and argumentation are cogent and non-contradictory

There are specific parameters for the kind of answers you can include in your learning portfolio:
2 of your answers must be for “ANALYSIS” questions.
These are short-answer style written responses that are meant to demonstrate your comprehension of course material and ability to apply to something external. Each of these answers should be around 500 words in length.
1 of your answers must be for a “RESEARCH” question. This is a long-answer or essay style written response that is meant to demonstrate your comprehension of course material, ability to do outside research, and ability to justify a given position. An answer to a RESEARCH question should be around 1000 words in length.
What you submit, therefore, is a portfolio that demonstrates 2 examples of your ability to apply class content to analyze something new and 1 example that demonstrates your ability to reason about class content using outside research.
You may be thinking that you have not done an assignment quite like this before. However, although your other classes might not have asked for “learning portfolios,” this assignment is simply combining things you have definitely done: reports, short essays, and written answers on midterms and exams. If it helps, you can think of this assignment as a collection of those things, graded in similar ways. Details on how these will be graded appear at the end of this document.
Stylistic Considerations
Formatting should be 12pt font, Times New Roman, double-spaced text. Although you can include a title page, all that is required is that your name, student number, and your TA’s name appear somewhere on the first page.
The answers in your learning portfolio all require citations. Please just use in-text citations with the author’s last name and page number when citing things in your answer
The “standard” for ANALYSIS questions is met by these three, equally-important criteria:
Reasoning and argumentation are cogent and non-contradictory
Connection to original reading and/or object of analysis is present
Evidence of correct comprehension of topic and other class material is competently demonstrated through specific references (e.g., citations, exact terminology, etc.)
The “standard” for RESEARCH questions is met by similar criteria:
Reasoning and argumentation are cogent and non-contradictory
Connection to course reading(s) and/or object of analysis is present
Evidence of correct comprehension of topic and other class material is competently demonstrated through specific references (e.g., citations, exact terminology, etc.)
Outside research is shown to be suitable, relevant, and appropriate, with at least one academic source confirming the points raised in the answer
The “standard” for STYLE is met through these criteria:
Paraphrasing is present, with direct quotations only used as necessary
Space is used competently and judiciously (i.e., the assignment does not contain sentences that, if removed, would not detract from the overall point)
Full sentences and paragraphs — as well as mechanics of writing (i.e., syntax and word choice) — communicate facts and ideas without causing difficulty for the reader
Formal elements of assignment are present (e.g., double-spacing)

Categories
Other

If you do any additional research for this paper, remember to cite your sources.

Your goal is to explain and defend the policy that medical professionals should follow when patients refuse major medical care that is recommended by health care professionals. (A different policy might apply to different kinds of patients.)
The main point of the assignment is to provide a comparison and contrast of deontology and rule consequentialism in relation to the moral principles of autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. How do they guide policies regarding refusal of care?
Illustrate your understanding of the application of your recommended policy by comparing its application material given in Unit 2: the case of Emma Gough (see discussion topic 2.1) and the case of Elisha McCauley (see discussion topic 2.2). Discuss both of them equally in your paper.
First, explain what deontology is, and present and explain the deontological policy on patient autonomy. Be careful! There may be times when the general policy does not apply to a patient. What are the exceptions, and what policies should apply to them? After you explain the policy supported by deontology, use it to evaluate the Gough and McCauley cases. Did the medical professionals do the right thing in these cases?
Second, explain what rule consequentialism is, and present and explain the rule consequentialist policy regarding patient autonomy. After you do that, proceed to evaluate the two cases.(Warning: you aren’t discussing rule consequentialism if you’re only looking at the consequences for the various options on a case-by-case basis.)
Third, present your own position: should we adopt the deontological approach or the rule consequentialist approach to patient autonomy and refusal of treatment? (Defend one of the two approaches, explaining why one approach is morally better, and apply it consistently. You are being inconsistent if you apply deontology to one case and then consequentialism to the other.) Doing this satisfies criteria 8 and 9 of the grading rubric.
This is not a research paper. If you do any additional research for this paper, remember to cite your sources. This is not a paper about the legalities of the case. There is no reason to assume that the legal status of a medical policy in the U.S. is the morally appropriate one.
1600 words

Categories
Other

The articles should be less than three-years-old.

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read How to Write an Article Review: Practical Tips and ExamplesLinks to an external site. and watch the video, How to Write an Article Review | Example, Format, Dos and Don’ts [UPDATED] | EssayProLinks to an external site..
Investigate professional journals and locate two articles relevant to issues in the United States and that pertain to organizational behavior topics from this course that interest you. You are to critique each article according to the instructions below. The articles should be less than three-years-old. You are to use the ProQuest Central database found in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.
Each three-page critique (a total of six pages for both critiques) must include the following three parts. Include both article reviews into one document for submission to Waypoint (do not submit two documents).
Complete the following three parts:
Identify the articles
Provide the reader with enough information about your articles so they will be able to locate the article. Describe your search process.
Summarize the articles
Identify the main points that the authors have tried to establish (i.e., 1, 2, 3, or first, second, third). There normally will be three to five main points per article. If you are summarizing a court case, you should discuss the following:
What provision of the law was at issue? Briefly state the facts of the case.
What legal tests were applied?
Were there any unusual elements in the case?
Provide sufficient information to demonstrate you understand the content of the article.
Critique the article
Provide your reaction (insightful, critical, and logical) to the points that the authors tried to make or an overall critique of the entire articles. A simple statement of agreement or disagreement is not sufficient. While you may make such a statement by way of introduction to your reaction, you must clearly and logically state the reasons for your position. You may also find the Writing Center’s resource Writing an Article CritiqueLinks to an external site..
The Article Critique paper
Must be six double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA StyleLinks to an external site. as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft WordLinks to an external site..
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper in bold font
Space should be between title and the rest of the information on the title page.
Student’s name
Name of institution
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Due date
Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic VoiceLinks to an external site. resource for additional guidance.
Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
For assistance on writing Introductions & ConclusionsLinks to an external site. as well as Writing a Thesis StatementLinks to an external site., refer to the Writing Center resources.
Must use at least two credible sources in addition to the course text.
The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible SourcesLinks to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view this University of Arizona Global Campus Library Quick ‘n’ DirtyLinks to an external site. tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.
Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your PaperLinks to an external site..
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References ListLinks to an external site. resource in the Writing Center for specifications.
Submission: Include both article reviews into one document for submission to Waypoint (do not submit two documents).

Categories
Other

This assignment has two parts – part a and

This assignment has TWO parts – PART A and
PART B – and each part requires you to critically respond to the questions provided. Follow all
directions carefully, including the length requirements.

Categories
Other

He has to write about his current area of expertise that relates to the subject matters the job will require of him.

Bruce Narcisse is trying to become a writer for a news outlet. The job requires that he writes an essay and the subject matter that job will be about is related to new technologies, new development in software, and cybersecurity. He has to write about his current area of expertise that relates to the subject matters the job will require of him. Not only that but he has to write about what makes him a good candidate for this job and his skills as a writer, while making sure his writing displays critical thinking skills and a good ability to research. However, he’s having issues writing this so you must do it in his stead. Make sure you write in the first person from Bruce Narcisse.

Categories
Other

5 paragraphs

It’s an illustration essay btw
1 page. 5 paragraphs
First about Jamaica second paragraph about the food in Jamaica third paragraph about the activities and fourth paragraph about the nightlife/ club
due Sunday
see attached

Categories
Other

Is the future of the firm a product line or set of product lines or is the future a collection of products that don’t fit into the product line concept?

The product, the product line, and the life cycle deliverable
This important deliverable further develops the nature of the business over time by addressing the following items.
a. Would a product, a service, or maybe some sort of combination better serve the customers’ needs? What options are there and provide a defendable rationale for your choice, making it clear that you considered the other options.
b. Is the future of the firm a product line or set of product lines or is the future a collection of products that don’t fit into the product line concept? Describe and provide a rationale.
c. What aspects of the “whole product” concept, including branding and packaging, are and are not relevant, and why?
d. From what you have learned, what is your plan to stay ahead of your competition and keep your business relevant and healthy?
e. As the business grows, what changes in roles, processes, life cycles, and products do you see being needed and why? Support your position with references from your reading and any research you may have done.
Are there any potential changes to your vision based on any new insights from this week’s work? If so, be sure to capture them so you can address them at the end of the course.
This deliverable should be consistent in style and format with the others you have produced and should be 3 to 4 pages in length.

Categories
Other

These is an examle

Prepare and present a PowerPoint poster based on order 4234538 See the following video for directions “How to Create a Scientific Poster in PowerPoint” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqgjgwIXadA (see rubric).
These is an examle